CENTRO DE DIAGNÓSTICO Y TRATAMIENTO

CENTRO DE DIAGNÓSTICO Y TRATAMIENTO

domingo, 30 de marzo de 2014

Los Sentidos y el Sexo

Según Kinsey, todo el cuerpo tiene capacidad erógena, que se manifiesta a través del sistema nervioso. El cerebro recibe los impulsos de los órganos sensoriales y tanto aquél como éstos son  imprescindibles para las sensaciones sexuales. Si desconectamos el cerebro de los órganos genitales como ocurre cuando hay una sección total de la médula espinal comprobaremos cómo queda anulada toda sensación de placer sexual, por muy bien que funcionen dichos órganos. Y viceversa: el cerebro, que por sí solo puede crear actividad sexual como ocurre en los sueños y en las poluciones nocturnas, necesita de los órganos genitales para poder manifestarla, si bien puede prescindir de ellos para su sensación placentera. El cerebro puede, incluso, anular psíquicamente un estímulo físico producido en los genitales inhibiendo, por ejemplo, su fantasía sexual para impedir así una eyaculación precoz.

Los estímulos externos alcanzan los órganos sensoria les y en las terminaciones nerviosas de éstos se producen luego‘ unos impulsos bioeléctricos que recorren los nervios hasta llegar a la médula o directamente al cerebro.
 
Cuando los estímulos sexuales son táctiles, alcanzan las terminaciones nerviosas de la piel y producen los impulsos bioeléctricos que recorrerán los nervios raquídeos para llegar a la médula espinal —*concretamente a la zona lumbar cuando se estimula la piel de los genitales—; a partir de aquí van por dos caminos: uno que llega directamente al cerebro para informar del estímulo y elaborar respuestas psicofísicas complejas y otro que sale inmediatamente de la médula para producir, al llegar a la zona estimulada, una respuesta inconsciente refleja y rápida.

Así, pues, el parapléjico (persona paralítica de la cintura para abajo, por una sección medular o por otras causas) generalmente consigue eyaculaciones, aunque no obtiene placer de éstas. ‘ >
Los estímulos sexuales no táctiles —vista, oído, olfato y gusto—— llegan directamente al cerebro produciendo una respuesta en cualquier zona del cuerpo. Cuando se añaden las percepciones táctiles a las no táctiles se produce un aumento en la percepción de todas. Asi, por ejemplo, en el sexo se incrementan el placer y la excitación si además de tocar‘ los seno, los estamos contemplando. Van der Velde (1926) recomienda mezclar en el beso los sentidos del tacto, del gusto y del olfato.
No termina aqui el papel del sistema nervioso sino que, gracias a una parte especializada del mismo —el sistema nervioso autónomo o involuntario-— conseguimos obtener modificaciones adecuadas en nuestros genitales para facilitar la realización del acto sexual, como puede ser la lubricación de la vagina y del pene, además de modificaciones generales, como el aumento del pulso, del ritmo respiratorio y otras.
La vista Si no partimos de un primer estímulo sexual, no sería fácil desencadenar el proceso de pensamientos sexuales

Las Caricias

El principal enemigo de una sexualidad adulta y racional es la ignorancia, que trae una serie de problemas y frustraciones, tanto para el individuo como para la pareja, impide vivir como personas, dificulta las relaciones, en especial en el matrimonio; crea complejos personales; trae embarazos no deseados; viene acompañada de problemas como la impotencia o desviaciones sexuales. Para que una sexualidad sea plena y madura es necesaria una adecuada información y un nivel de madurez personal importante.

Las zonas erógenas son las diversas partes del cuerpo humano capacitadas especialmente para recibir o transmitir estímulos sexuales. Se emplean aquí todos los sentidos, pero sobre todo el del tacto. Una descripción de las zonas erógenas del hombre debería incluir la zona genital, los labios y la lengua, las orejas, el cuello, las tetillas, la cintura, los muslos, las manos, el codo.
 
En la mujer, el placer es mayor si las caricias se concentran en determinadas zonas: la boca, los labios y la lengua, la vulva, los senos, las orejas, el cuello, los hombros, las manos, el monte de Venus, los muslos, el codo, la cadera, la axila.

Para mí, el contacto del cuerpo es más importante que los orgasmos. Un buen beso, una sonrisa, tocarse en medio de la noche y oír el latido del corazón y la respiración, los ojos (¡los ojos!) y las palabras que se dicen después de hacer el amor, hacen del sexo algo muy especial.
 
Un abrazo intenso y un ‘te quiero’ y ‘te querré’ y ‘lo eres todo para mí’ y ‘aquí está mi corazón y mi alma’, valen más que todo el oro del mundo. Un abrazo apasionado y de corazón puede ser superior a un orgasmo». Estas palabras, entresacadas del Informe Hite, expresan la importancia que pueden tener ‘ la conversación y las caricias para muchas mujeres e incluso para muchos hombres: e e
En la caricia intervienen varios elementos. En primer lugar, la finalidad de la caricia es la expresión de un afecto y la consecución del deleite sexual. Cuando acariciamos. manifestamos a la otra persona amor y cariño ‘o aceptación. En la relación de la pareja la caricia tiene.
 
además, un componente sexual importante. tanto de excitación en vistas a la culminación del placer sexual. como de finalidad en sí misma. o sea. la caricia por la caricia. porque es agradable y placentera.
 
Según lo dicho anteriormente. existiría la caricia afectiva. la caricia sexual y la afectivo-sexual. La caricia afectiva se da cuando nos relacionamos con los familiares, los niños. los animales. etc. Con ella se comunica cariño, amor, se da seguridad, se consuela.
 
La caricia sexual mira más directamente a la estimulación y la excitación sexuales y puede realizarse. como hemos indicado antes, sin vistas al orgasmo o como una preparación para el coito. Este tipo de caricias en estado puro es menos frecuente y suele darse más la afectivo-sexual. ya que en
V toda relación de pareja suele haber un componente afectivo. que es extraordinario cuando existe un amor pro fundo.
 
La sociedad pone innumerables impedimentos al contacto físico y a la caricia. La gente incluso está en guardia para eliminar cualquier elemento erótico en la caricia afectiva. Los contactos muy tiernos e íntimos entre padres e hijos cuando éstos son pequeños, llegan a espaciarse y a desaparecer cuando se convierten en adolescentes. Se rechaza todo atisbo erótico en este sentido y cuesta reconocerlo. Aunque en el ser humano haya un componente sexual implícito en las relaciones con los familiares, culturalmente lo negamos. Cuando una madre contempla el cuerpo bien formado de su hijo joven, o un hermano y una hermana se pellizcan en ciertas zonas, hay un elemento erótico más o menos ligero, que hay que reconocer y que en modo alguno indica perversidad.

La caricia sexual o erótica se distingue por las siguientes características: la finalidad de la caricia, que es la excitación y el placer; la zona acariciada, que puede ser la cara o las manos en la afectiva, mientras que la erótica se desborda y llena todo el cuerpo como un torbellino, fijándose en especial en las zonas erógenas y se dirige, según progresa la caricia, a los órganos sexuales.

La caricia erótica suele ser rítmica y repetitiva: se estimula una y otra vez la zona elegida, hasta que se comprende que tocar esa zona ya no es efectivo, pasando a otra nueva, para volver luego a la anterior, o bien se persiste en una determinada, si se trata de conseguir el clímax, en cuyo caso será generalmente en el clítoris o en el pene.
 
La intensidad de la caricia sexual es variable: al principio es suave y luego se va incrementando su fuerza, puede volverse nuevamente a la suavidad o continuar en intensidad creciente. Cuando se llega a cotas elevadas de excitación sexual, la estimulación puede hacerse dolorosa. ¿Cuáles son los órganos que se pueden acariciar? La respuesta es: todo el cuerpo. Conviene emplear especialmente las manos y brazos, la nuca y los dientes, la lengua y los labios, los senos de la mujer y las tetillas del hombre, el pene, piernas y pies, el abdomen. Las zonas erógenas darán un placer más in-
tenso. y Hay un problema que preocupa a algunas mujeres: cuando comienzan a acariciarse con su pareja, parece que el hombre quiere llegar siempre en seguida al coito, mientras que. ellas estarían muy a gusto prodigándose caricias de todo tipo, que las hacen sentirse muy felices.
 
Por otra parte, si es la mujer quien las comienza, el varón interpreta que ella quiere el coito, cuando no siempre es así. Realmente, la causa de estos malentendidos es la mala información o formación sexual y la mala comunicación entre los amantes. El hombre debe conocer a su pareja y darse cuenta cuándo ésta desea unos momentos de solaz y ternura y cuándo quiere ser excitada hasta el orgasmo.
 
Es una cuestión de delicadeza y de atención por parte del hombre, que debe tratar de conjugar sus
deseos con los de su compañera, obteniendo así un beneficio mutuo. Hay tiempo para el coito, tiempo para la caricia y tiempo para la caricia larga que precede al coito. Todo debe caber en la vida de relación sin que un elemento anule a los demás, pues en ese caso sobrevendrán en seguida el aburrimiento o la frustración, echando por tierra toda armonía o interés.

miércoles, 22 de enero de 2014

Pedagogia de la Sexualidad: Una breve reflexion

Una breve reflexión
Desde un punto de vista sociológico cada individuo, desde nacimiento, se  está educando sexualmente, primero, en casa con los padres, familias, amigos, medio de comunicaciones, escuelas y  demás a través los  valores, normas, costumbres, actitudes, acciones, opiniones, consideraciones u omisiones de las personas o ambiente socio-culturales que está rodeando.
El aprender, tanto como el no aprender, está educándose; el hacer, tanto como el no hacer, está educándose; besar, tanto como el no besar, está educándose; desnudar, tanto  como el no desnudar o cubrir; está educándose; dejarle que se mira y toque  sus genitales, tanto como el  prohíbe mirar o toque, está educándose; abrazar y besar ante de gente, tanto como reprimírselo; está educándose. Cualquier acción y actitud que se haga, o que no se haga, afectara y determinara su educación sexual, por lo que debemos entender esta proceso del aprendizaje o socialización como un proceso dinámica mucho más complejo, complicado y completo que el mero hecho de hablar un día sobre el sexo¡
Muchos educadores de la sexualidad y amor; es decir, los amigos, las escuelas, los medios de comunicaciones, los médicos, gobierno,  incluso mayoría de los papas y mamas, ante la “pena y vergüenza” que el tema de la sexualidad les produce, justifican  sus incapacidades de hablar sobre la sexualidad; así crean  que el amor y sexo si  es una sensación placentera, cuya experiencia es una cuestión de casualidad y   se aprender solas en la calle, y no requiere  ninguna aprendizaje y esforzarse ¡
Además, la llamada educación que la mayoría de nosotros ha recibido ha sido de tipo limitado y  restrictivo; de forma directa o indirecta, se nos aconsejó hablar lo menos posible del tema porque no era “bonito”, y , en las  otras culturas consideraron  “pecado” y “sucio”¡ Así , nos dejaron lagunas bastante profundas, puesto que incluso las nociones más básicas de anatomía sexual se eludieron y evitaron ¡Muchos podemos recordar los libros de ciencias naturales, en los que el cuerpo humano parecía carecer de órganos genitales. Parte de la inhibición y dificultad que tenemos para hablar de sexo responde a lo obedientes que fuimos ante esta actitud ambigua frente a lo sexual ¡
Los resultados de este tipo de pensamiento y postura se presentan con gran cantidad de problemas, dificultades, disfunciones, desintegraciones familias, mediocridades, deshonestidades, adulterios, agresiones, violaciones, desviaciones, enfermedades, embarazos no deseados, separaciones y divorcios ¡
En otra lado, mucho años de información distorsionadas, incorrectos, represiones sociales, ocultamientos, espejismos, mitos y fantasías culturales y religiosos han dado lugar a un cumulo de falsedades y tabúes; así como, a separar la sexualidad del resto de la personalidad del individuo. Cuestiones como: Que es, con quien, cuando y como sobre el sexo, tanto entre la familia, como en la escuela, y público se generan pena y  angustia, y considerando rara, fea y /o maleducada ¡
Pero, al contrario,  ahora,  no se trata de que la mayoría de gente no quieren, o  no conocen la importancia de psicopedagogía de la sexualidad y amor para  mejora su vida,  sin embargo la importante es que nosotros conocemos que la misma gente  carecen y son  ignorante   de su propio historia, cultura,  sexualidades, explotaciones, hostilidades, y  las patologías pero están alimentando  sino que la mismo   gente diario estén platicando mor morosamente de la sexualidad, ven innumerables películas basados en historia de amor felices o desagradables, escuchando centenares de canciones insignificantes que ablando de amor patológicos, películas pornografías sádicos, adulterinas, cambios de parejas, uniones libres, separaciones, divorcios y casar otra y otras ves; una poligamia cubierta; sin embargo, y cuestiona casi nadie piensa: ¿Por qué y que es mal o que   no está  funcionando bien , y  aprender para solucionarlos ¡?
 El punto central que debe reflexionar y tomar en consideración es que  la sexología no  es una simple ciencia  aislada y separada del restos del disciplinas sino es  una disciplina pluridimensional, pero interdisciplinario y multidisciplinario, que  su entendimiento requiere las contribuciones de otras disciplinas como antropología, biología, historia, medico, psicología, sociología, patologías culturales y sociales ¡
¿Qué nos dice la historia? 

miércoles, 30 de octubre de 2013

Pornography

Pornography fulfills a gnawing and voracious drive within society. Sex, because of its taboo imlications, in some feelings of guilt. In addition, in this environment, it is forever an area of various degrees of unfulfilled drives and frustration.
In a society where sexual guilt and privation is instilled early in life and where there is considerable repression, suppression and deprovation, every individual will have some level of sexual frustration, often acute.
If you examine the contents of any pornogrphy, you will inmediately see that it largely portrays, voyeuristically, that which cannot be achieved in reality, sexual fulfillment amid the unnatural mandates of the culture. It reflects the distorted and pathological sexual drives born out of implanted guilt; repression and high levels of frustration, In pornography, sex is presented as somethig dirty, sunful and ignoble. the high demand for pornographic material reflects the high level of sexual frustration within the society.
It also reflects the various shades of pathological sex drives the culture has inevitably spawned. The prevalence of rape,s adism, masochism, sodomy, bestiality, etc., portrayed in pornography represents harmful drives which have been stimulated through a distortion of natural drives and maintained largely through continued cuntural delusions and strictures.
The message here is that we can no longer Project the blame for Evil upon some creature of the Underworld (which God supposedly created), but must look to the evil within our own ideas and systems. The evil is carried by our cultures and by us. All of our insanities have their roots in a society's delusions.
Pornography provides an artificial bridge, uniting the world of religious condemnation with sexual fulfillment, a condition that can never be achieved in reality. A universal characteristic of pornography is that it portrays sex as something evil which must be hidden. It follows the Judeo-Christian ethic, but pairs the accepted evil with sexual excitement, protraying sex with all the negative connotations society and the religions heap upon it, while providing stories where sexual fulfillment, in all its distorted forms is, never-the.less, achieved.
What is denied the reader or the viewer in reality is provided in fantasy. In all probability, the pornography market could not exist at anywhere near its present level, if at all, were  not for the pathology of religión. The same holds true for virtually all sexual activity involving degradation and/or forcé or injury, for all sex crimes where there is violation and, all to often, mutilation.
We have a natural 'right' to protect ourselves and others against damaging attack. This is a right that should never be relinquished, However, we should only empower government to step in where the individual is unable to defend, carefully limitin government involvement.

The Mother: Victim and Vector

There is a need to consider the differences between man and woman in terms of the way they tend to think. Just why this difference exists is not entirely clear but it is sure to be strongly related to adaptive mechanisms related to differences in gender roles.
The woman's role has differed from the male's, of necessity. As the bearer of the Young, which requires an extended period of protection and care before the offspring can provide for its own needs, her role has been more confining than that of the male. The woman and child have to be protected and provided for and, normally, spend a long period of intense interrelationship. The establishment and maintenance of a safe 'nest' has ever been the woman's chief concern and focus.
Toward this end she has to be the pragmatist, manupulating the man and other aspects of her environment, using and odoing what-ever was neccessary to achieve this end. Forther, the role of mother meant endless work and attention to small details.
Being largely dependent upon the producrivity and protection of the male, her behavior has characterictically been largely determined by, or dependent upon, the male´s activity. This may account for what appears to be more emotionally based and manipulative behavior than the male. Her role, historically, ahas provided Little time or opportunity for intelectual pursuits and complex patterns of behavior based upon inductive reasoning. She is probably more adept at accessing sublingual activities of the brain.
NOw, in modern societies, we see a diversification of the woma's role virtually as wide as human endeavor itself, from truck driver to politicaian to scientist to astronaunt. The woman is still fulfilling the role of mother and nest-tender even though she usually also spends a large part of her time as bread-winner. Even though job requirements may necessitate behavior determined by unemotional reasoning, she would appear to be as emotionally biased as her forebears, behavior and decisions being determined more by hoy it 'feels' than by being the end product of a reasoning process. Both men and women are inclined to make emotional decisions. However, the women appears to be more emotionally determined than the man.
Should this be true, it has serious implications for society since it is the mother who is the primary transmitter of cultural information to the very Young child. In the child's earliest and most formative and vulnerable years, it is primarily the mother who plants the first sedes of societies' fantasies and insanities.
The woman more often accepts the packaged belief systems of the clture and transmits these to the children. It is usually she who imparts the belief in a god, who implants a wide array of fears and feelings of insecurity and who leaves the child largely defenseless in terms of accurate reasoning patterns. It is also the woman who usually begins the process of instilling the belief in the child that sex is evil and dirty. She is both the victim, and the vector, the carrier and transmitter of cultural diseases.
The man also imparts hos share of irrationality, of course, but it is the woman who spends the most time with the very Young child, It is she who has the closest and most influential contact with the child during those first few years of greatest impressionability and vulnerability.
 
RELIGION AND SEX
 
From the mist of time before recorded history, even before the codification of man's 'evel' nature, religión has player the primary roll in defininf sexul roles in the various cultures throughout history.
Sincé sexuality is a vital natural drive which greatly affects everyone, it becomes the source of great power for any instutition which can gain dominion over its expression. Instilling belief in this área transfers tremendous power to the institutions The technique used by western religions is to first condemn the drive as something basically evil and unclean; something for which one should feel guilt, then to proscribe all but a narrow menas and set of circumstances under which the expression of the drive is sanctioned. Naturally, that expression will be in line with the fulfilling of the religion's agenda.
The greatest leverage for control and manipulation is probably in the instilling of guilt feelings and taboo. These can be generalized and used to steer behavior in virtually any direction, the taboo generating public rage toward any transgressor. This is one of the primary menas of undercutting self-reliance and the generation of dependency. The destruction of self-sufficiency becomes an important precursor to maintaining a following. It is an important precondition in gaining dherents who will not stray from the dogma.
In Western cultures the manipulation of sexuality has been the primary means of 'keeping the woman in her place', that is, pregnant and in the nest, producing more followers for the church. It has been the primary mechanism for keeping her role as that of a baby Factory, and promary teacher of the culture's various dogma.
She provides the institutions, especially the religions, with increasing numbers to exploit, already infected with basic indoctrination; the preliminary hoooks, in the form of the beliefs she has instilled in the child already firmly in place.
This area of manipulation by the religions has been the primaty menas of keeping men in control as leaders. this control is still intact while millions of women do battle with very personal demons in their own private hells.
I can immediately recall three cases of permanent damage due directly to religious teachings. All three were women deeply inmersed in the same religión, although at different times and in different circumstances. They represent different damage from different perspectives, but religión strongly affecting the lives of all these women.
One was a Young woman about 20 years old with a seemingly healthy sex drive, at least in that it was too stron to be denied. However, after each sexual encounter, after having reaching a climax, she would experience nausea and spend considerable time in the bathroom, retching. After all, sex was dirty, evil and disgsting. this woman wold eventually overcome her passions, becoming frigid and a 'ball buster', a large part of the 'evel' projected onto men.
Another was a college student in a design class who exhibited conceptual distortions in every area of activity. In one instance, the class was given the assignment of designinga 'feelie box' that would provide a tactile experience representing a lover. The box was to have a curtained hole through which one cold reach in and achieve a tactile experience representing some aspect of that stident's idea of a lover. This girl's box was fitted with a large pon cushion, with many pins, all pointing outward. When asked why?, she explained that they represented her most dominant feelings about touching someone, discomfort of an electric shock.
Here was a Young woman who had come to physical maturity with no commentsirate emotional or factualknowledge development in terms of her own sexuality. Naive and ignorant, life for this woman will never match the preconceived idealizations she has internalized in place of the stuff of real life. She will always feel cheated and never feel at one with herself or with nature. the world will never match her expectations. This girl eventually joined a religious order.
The third was a woman in her late thirties who was the mother of ten living children, She was robustly healthy and had a powerful sex drive. However, she had reached a compromiso between the sexual pleasures she enjoyed and he guilt it generated. When caught inthe cascading throws of climax she would gasp: "Give me a baby! Give me a baby!". Even so, she expressed that shs still felt she was doing something wrong.
Significantly, all three were Roman Catholic. All three had been from families who were deeply involved in the religión, had been immersed in it all their lives, and would not quiestion any aspect of the dogma.

The Seeds of Sexual Distortion

Human cultures are riddled with myths, fantasies and delusions. Out of these grow the taboos, destructive acultural impratives, dysfunctional behavior, and defective systems which, in turn, insure that Homo Sapiens continues to be the most disturbed and vicious animal on this planet.
Virtually all of our ignorance and misdirection results from instituted and codified conceptual pathogens. The individual generates Little of his or her own conceptual structure, mainly accepting and internalizing the instituted conceptual baggage of culture.
Any delusional information will generate some form of dysfuntion within the individual and the society. The highly deluded individual is also highly vulnerable to further false indoctrination. The most difficult cognitive problema for the individual is simply that of recognizing cultural teachings as being largely delusional. Cultural identity is usually an euphemism for cultural delusion.
In an environment structured to maintain delusion, one finds Little definitive information, and virtually no encouragement toward orienting people to the realities. Falsehoods infect every sector of invlvement and inquirí. There are few, if any, aspects of existence is which our institutional sources present a clear and accurate view. The delusional a-priori infects and distorts all cognizance. Little exists in reality as presented by our cultures. This cannot be emphasized enough. Everything gets distorted.
The overwhelming use of language and custom in human societies functions to support delusional cognitive systems. Our language is more often used to obfuscate tan to enlighten; to hide, rather tan expose; to generate confusión, not understanding. The overwhelming use of a language is to propagandize and to amintain the institutions and the debilitating belief. All to maintain the institutions and the objective reality and the development of cognitive integrity.
Were our obectives more toward discovery and the acceptance of factual reality, we would have systems and societies able to make corrections. Where there is broad rejection of reality, perceptions becme divergent from knowledge and selling must be on an emotional basis instead of apprealing to reason ando índices of evidence. Emotional bias is accentuated at the expense of reason. Nowhere is propaganda more in use than in institutional manipulation of human sexuality. In no area of fundamental human function does one find more rejection of the realities than in the area of sex. For the greater numbers, this is an area of frustration, of distorted drives and delusional expectations.
Sexuality is the most all-pervasive area of taboo. the basis for much of this taboo stems from Western and Middle Eastern religious teachings which deem sexual gratification as ignoble, if not evil and amintain an "obscenity of the flesh" that poisons, distorts and frustrates our natural drives.
On a physiological basis, sexual drives are governed primarily by chemistry, through hormonal secretios. These chemicals trigger physiological and emotional responses. The development of human sexual mechanisms and drives has its bigginings in the zygote and continues through childhood to adulthood, changing endlessly throughout life.
this is an area of human drives and function that cannot be denied and, therefore, provides a vulnerable Access point for hogh levels of manipulation and control of the individual. By implating associated guilt and fear, high levels of conflict, stress and deprovation can be induce. The reduction of these unpleasant conditions can be used to shape behavior.
Yet, where normal drives are in conflict with unnatural taboos and cultural proscriptions, supperession of behavior by society causes pressures and dostortions to build to eventual explosive levels, tendencies that would otherwise never reach levels of expression can become truely devastatin when they are not longer contained.
 
THE EARLY ASSAULT ON SEXUALITY
 
It is in childhood that most of our emotional and cognitive distortions have their roots. The damage, to a large degree, is permanent. With the subject, and the fact, of childhood sexuality being taboo and childhood sexual drives being suppressed, almost invariably punished, there is Little ability to avoid either the instillation of guilt and other negative attitudes and associations, or the effects.
A taboo area is like a closed infection, it is where the problems build but cannot be examined, cannot be aired, drives cannot be fulfilled and reduced; where relaxed discussions and experimentation cannot take place, allowing individuals, children or adults, to work out their needs as natural aspects of life. The problems feed upon themselves, and grow.
In is in childhood that the sedes are sown for virtually every functional problema of adulthood, sexuality being just one serious and vulnerable area.
 

The Failure to Educate

The Public School System is fatally flawed by goals which do not reflect reality. As such, ut can never be effective in educating toward a truly functional social system. Under its present premise structure, both the system and its product will forever be at odds with reality. In addition, both will continue to ferment conflict, internatlly, as well as externally with other irrationalities.
Harmony with nature, as well as among groups and individuals, can come only through dealind in trhth and reality. The attempt to abridge reality is the root cause of all destructive uman conduct. Ignoring this fact will not make ir go away.
As has been indicated elsewhere, our Government is a fair representation of the society. Its' urrationalities reflect ideas held by an overwhelming majority of citizens. Government cannot be expected to determine what would constitute an effective public school system, or any other system.

Religion and Government

Religión is the great dementor. It functions to deny any rational basis for existence and maintain a created Cosmos without principles, other tan the arbitrary will of "God". Once these a-priori have been implanted, the individual is rendered incapable of accepting the factual nature of exitence, as per the principle of Reciprocal Cognitive Exclusión (RCE). In order to maintain the belief, the reciprocal reality must be denied or excluded.
Religión provides the mythical basis for authority and Authoritarianism, providing a foundation and rationale for authoritarian governing. It renders the  individual impotent, ignirant of the physical realities and unable to reason critically or accept corrective information. the individual is unable to recognize or resist either the degenerative processes or the parasitical nature of the controlling institutions of religión and current forms of government.
The indoctrinated citizen does not grasp the role religión play in preparing and maintaining population submissive to authoritarian governing.
Given the breadth and depth of facutal knowledge available today, authoritarian governing would probably not be posible, were it not for the degenerative effects of religion. This is the ubiquitous functional relationship, and mutual affinity between religion and government.

martes, 29 de octubre de 2013

The Inherently Flawed 'God' Concept

The concept of 'God' contains implied contradictions or absurdities which, if recognized by the believer, would probably result in its immediate rejection. Quite often yo will hear a child, having been told that God created everything, blurt out the quiestion. 'But, who created God?', hitting the target dead center. Even a small child can often sense the absurdity of the concept of an omnipotent god.
To say that 'God' has existed forever and created everything explains nothing and leaves us with the concept of an unfathomable existence, a magic universo where anything can happen. This belief is highly destructive to the intellect of the individual, particularly that of a child.
However, as we continue to examine the nature of real existence, the particulars of how it Works become evident and understandable. As opposed to the Gawd did it. 'Cliché', we now understand the controlling mechanisms that are at the level of the primary particles. These controls are internal, not imposed from beyond nature.
The concepts of 'God' and 'omnipotence' require something beyond a simple divergent from manifest existence, it constitutes a belief in magic. This is the fundamental insanity, believing in magic is to believe that anything is possible, a complete departure from the recognition of reality.
Yet, 'God', omnipotence and magic also carry the implication of organization, the ultimante organization. The most fundamental concept of existence is denied, the 'primacy of structure', the fact that you can't have organization without structure to maintain that organization.
For there to be organization, there must be some physical 'thing' organized, even for the organization of ideas. the physical realities cannot be dismissed or otherwise made to be something other than what they are.
Another most obvious absurdity in the concept of an omnipotent 'God' is that, if 'God' has existed forever, in that there vas no creation for 'him', 'her' or 'it', why would such a being créate everything else in existence at some point in time, somewhere in the midst of eternity?
Most religions claim this creation occured just a few thousand years ago. that this god should 'create' everythin at any point in eternity constitutes an absurdity. If 'God'  has existed forever, how is it that creation occurred only four thousand years ago or a few million years ago or twenty billion years ago? Any point in time you choose for creation will remain an absurdity, assuming an eternal 'God'.
These, then, are the primacy absurdities inherent in the concept of 'God'. the list is limited only by the amount of time one cares to devote pondering the implications. Everything we have learnes abut the universo indicates that things really woks in ways that are mutually exclusive with the concept of 'god'. Regardless of the direction one approaches the 'God'.
Belief can never ultimately Foster integrity or human functionality, simply because it is incompatible with intelectual integrit, it is founded on delusion. In order for such religión to survive, it must forever be at odds with the ultimate realities and instill defective thought patterns in its minions.